January, Again
Last year, I had only gotten as far as reading a few other people's reflections on marriage and name changes (most likely I intended to weave them skillfully into this post, but I'll just list them here):
- A Salon article by Audrey Fisch on combination names for children
- Another Salon piece by Carol Lloyd on the historical reasons for giving a child his father's name (Lloyd herself didn't follow this convention)
- A funny and thoughtful feminist defense of marriage by Lisa Miya-Jervis
- A list of options for changing (or not changing) one's name after marriage, on the Feminist Utopia website
- A scholarly article on societal perceptions of women who don't take their husbands' last names
I regret to say that although Ryan and I have been more actively thinking about and discussing name changes since we got engaged in August, the whole issue remains as much a problem as ever. Years ago, when we first decided that we'd stick it out together, but we weren't sure we liked the idea of marriage, we played with the idea of both taking a new last name as a signal of our commitment. We had a couple of friends whose parents had done that when they'd gotten married (in the seventies, most likely), and we liked the idea of choosing a new name to reflect a new union and the beginning of a new family. One friend's parents had combined the letters in their last names to create a new one, and the other friend's parents had taken the name of a little-known writer whom they both admired. Ryan and I have gotten the Scrabble letters out on more than one occasion to try the former approach, but we haven't been able to come up with anything we like. We've also considered adopting a maiden name that was dropped in one of our families. We like that idea because it provides some continuity with our family histories (well, one of them, at least) and also honors a female ancestor who was obliged (maybe) to drop her name. But, again, we haven't been able to find a name we really like.
We've mentioned to a few friends and family members that we're considering taking a new last name, and most of them seem to think it's really weird. Which brings us to another problem--will anyone take us seriously if we both change our names? We're both at stages in our careers where it wouldn't be too difficult to make the switch, but I can imagine some friends and family members, especially older ones, persisting in using our "real" names. So, some days, we're tempted not to change our names at all. I kind of like the Scandinavian sound of mine, even though I don't feel any particular attachment to my Scandinavian roots (perhaps because I come by them by way of Utah?). But we think we may have kids someday, and we'd both like to have the same last name as our kids (although I suspect it's becoming increasingly common for mothers--or fathers--and their children to have different names).
I just realized that nowhere in this discussion have I mentioned the possibility of my taking Ryan's last name, or his taking mine. That option doesn't feel very attractive to either of us. Neither of us wants to feel that his or her identity is being subsumed under the other's, no matter how symbolically. I think the best option really would be to find a new name that we can both take, but we may run out of time to think of one. The trick seems to be coming up with something we like that also feels as though it's ours.
3 Comments:
At January 23, 2006 6:47 PM,
Anonymous said…
I'm not sure exactly what happened with it, but I know a couple of people who intended to change both their last names to an ancestor's name when they got married. I believe that for some reason they weren't able to go through with it when they got married, and intend to at some point, but got sidetracked with other things. My understanding is that it actually turned out to be kind of a hassle for them.
As I think you know, T took my last name as hers, and we both adopted her last name as a second middle name. Which I like a lot, except that it causes trouble when dealing with most bureacracies. Social Security was okay with it, but Michigan needed us to have the two middle names hyphenated, beceause their system couldn't deal with a space in the middle name box.
Also, as we hit more and more stuff like that, it's pushing us to revert back to our original middle names, with using my last name, which is a little sad. It's not tough to imagine looking back at it five years from now as a weird, long-forgotten oddity.
At January 23, 2006 7:57 PM,
Jen Sorenson said…
I know a couple of people who have added the second middle name, and I like the concept, but it does seem likely that the second middle name will eventually be dropped or ignored. It's disturbing to hear that you've encountered so many bureaucratic hassles. A few people have responded to our plan by suggesting that it will be an enormous hassle for Ryan to change his last name, and I thought that was silly because women change their last names all the time. But maybe some systems are set up to make it easier for women to take their husbands' names than for anyone to change his/her name for any old reason. Sigh... we'll see.
At January 23, 2006 10:31 PM,
Renate said…
Jen,
I was just perusing Friendster, found your blog, and was psyched to hear of all the good news in your life. I don't know what made me more excited: you joining the legal profession or that you and Ryan are getting married, and still asking yourselves tough questions.
As a fan of the 'zine Bitch, I'm looking forward to reading the Lisa Miya-Jervis article you linked too. Josh and I have decided to have a wedding-like event and we're trying to figure out what parts of tradition we want to reclaim, and what we want to discard. I'm curious about how you and Ryan came to the decision...
Anyhow, on the subject of names, though Josh and I haven't discussed it seriously, I once joked that we should both become "Lum" My last name is Lunn and his is Lerner. Both of our signatures look identical-- it looks like we're signing "Lummmmm".
Post a Comment
<< Home